The last couple of years were distinguished by existential turbulences that involuntarily restricted the activities of the Principality of Sealand to a few core fields and about which an in-depth commentary will be forthcoming shortly due to its public interest for Germany.

Nevertheless was the year 2007 rich in positive events in the technical field and above all state activities and developments. This culminated in the recognition of the Principality of Sealand and its representative by the Bundesgerichtshof, as witnessed in the following pages and is also reflected in the last missive from the District Court at Lippstadt (# 4.14 of the appendix).

This irritation lasting decades can be attributed in no small measure to the deliberate deception of the general public − including the judiciary − by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the FRG (# 4.2 of the appendix).

Thus all attempts by the Principality of Sealand to return the technical inheritance of the German Reich, among others the Vril technology, to its rightful owners have been thwarted. The rightful owner is a sovereign Germany without restrictions. This sovereignty however demands the lifting of all provisos of the Allies (# 3 of the appendix) that are still valid today. This may only be achieved in the context of a peace treaty between all parties of the Second World War.

This goal should be reachable within the next three years, as I also informed Federal Chancellor Merkel (# 4.10 of the appendix).

Johannes W. F. Seiger

Documentation in connection with the decision by the BGH of August 3, 2007
Concerning the Sovereignty of the Principality of Sealand as well as
the diplomatic immunity of its Prime Minister
Johannes W. F. Seiger

Whole Documentation - German (52,5 MB)

1.    Comments by the Prime Minister in October 2007

2. to the BGH Decision of August 3, 2007 (whole subject 2 - German)
2.1.  Conclusions concerning the BGH Decision
2.2.  Original text of the BGH Decision
2.3.  Comments by the Appellant 18.07.07
2.4.  Inquiry by the BGH correspondent 04.07.07
2.5.  Petition by the Attorney General 20.06.07

3.    Concerning the Sovereignty of the FRG (whole subject 3)
3.1.  Page 1: Transition Agreement 1990, Article 2 Paragraph 1
3.2.  Page 2: Transition Agreement 1990, Article 7 Paragraph 1 and Conclusions:
Limited Sovereignty due to the provisos by the Allies
3.3.  Letter by the Federal Ministry of Justice of 29.03.04:
Confirmation that both articles are in force

4.    Documentation Concerning the Comments by the Appellant (summary)
4.1.  Sheet 1–10: to the recovering of missing cultural goods (Amber Room) from the time of NS (30.08.98), Correspondence with G. Glogowski, Prime Minister of Lower Saxony
4.2.  Sheet 11–36: Letter to Josef Fischer, Federal Minister of the Foreign office of March 15, 2005. Re: The views by yourself and your house concerning the State Quality of the Principality of Sealand
Answer: Ms Dr. S. Wasum-Rainer by proxy, letter of April 11, 2005: no diplomatic rights, no sanctity of the person
4.3.  Sheet 37–109: Correspondence between the Chancellery of the FRG, the Foreign Office of the FRG, the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Russia and others
4.4.  Sheet 110–140: M. Platzeck, Prime Minister of the State of Brandenburg, criminal complaint of May 10, 2007 concerning attempted murder as indirect delinquent. No answer.
4.5.  Sheet 141–142: Register Court AG Potsdam: Insolvency proceedings on December 30 1999,
January 17, 2000: Deregistration of the company
4.6.  Sheet 143–145: Finance court Münster, Decision of December 1, 1995 concerning the Sealand Trade Corporation: “This decision is incontestable.” – Thus the existence of the Sealand Trade Corporation is also incontestable.
4.7.  Sheet 146–245: Dr. Schaubelt, Vice President of the District Court Potsdam, letter of November 27, 2005: Insolvency case of the Sealand Warenhandels- und Vertriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG
4.8.  Sheet 246–249: Letter of July 5, 2007 by the tax authorities Luckenwalde: order of attachment and transfer of garnished clause for € 822.352,60.
4.9.  Sheet 250–251: G. Schröder, Chancellor of the FRG, offer of April 26, 2005, personally to test a Sealand Generator (Vril Technology, cosmic or free energy). No answer.
4.10. Sheet 252–271: Dr. A. Merkel, Chancellor of the FRG, letter of September 20, 2006, demanding to engage visibly for a Peace Treaty – the formal ending of the Second World War. Testing offer for a Sealand Generator. No answer.
4.11.  Sheet 272–281: Dr. G. Sabathil/Frau D. Jering (deputy), European Commission: Letter of January 17, 2007: Incarceration despite diplomatic immunity.
H. van Steen, European Commission, new and renewable energy sources, letter of April 24, 2007: Presentation of the Vril Technology and testing offer. No answer.
4.12. Sheet 282–285: Letter of June 1, 2007, to the Ambassadors of the four Allies: Information about the letter to Dr. A. Merkel, Chancellor of the FRG
4.13. Sheet 286: W. Rissmann, Director of the District Court Luckenwalde, letter of May 12, 1999: Revocation of the acknowledgement of the diplomatic immunity “As directed by the President of the Higher Regional Court Brandenburg …”

Not in the BGH File:

4.14. Letter by the District Court Lippstadt of October 16, 2007, for the first time with the correct legal address following the decision by the BGH as well as the preceding letter by the Prime Minister J. W. F. Seiger of October 10, 2007 to the District Court Lippstadt